Finding Earth 2.0

Exoearth Evidence Observatory · by Biswajit Jana

Finding Earth 2.0
in distant worlds

What did we detect? What could our surveys detect? What underlying population is consistent with those observations? Which measurement should we make next? Every point behind this text is a real system with a measured distance, drawn at its catalogue sky position.

0

confirmed planets

across 4,764 systems

0

source records

13 archive tables

0

spectral measurements

104 planets with spectra

0

in the conservative HZ

279 optimistic

Of 6,354 confirmed planets, only 15 are both inside the conservative habitable zone and small enough to be plausibly rocky — and only 1 of those has a mass that was actually measured rather than predicted from its radius.

The search is not limited by how many planets we know about. It is limited by how few we have measured well.

6,327 systems rendered · 27 excluded for having no measured distance · radial axis log-compressed

The question

Five things that get conflated, kept apart

Headlines collapse “Earth-sized”, “habitable-zone”, “potentially habitable” and “could host life” into one claim. They are different claims, supported by different evidence, and this project reports them separately at every stage.

Earth similarity
Bulk radius, density, escape velocity and equilibrium temperature resemble Earth's.
Habitable-zone position
Incident flux is compatible with surface liquid water under a stated climate model.
Rocky plausibility
Radius sits below the regime where planets are predominantly volatile-rich.
Atmospheric observability
Whether an atmosphere could be characterised with current instruments.
Evidence for life
Not established for any planet. No metric here estimates it.

New population chapter

The catalogue is only what Kepler could see

I followed 89 DR25 candidates backwards through reliability, transit geometry, pipeline recovery and vetting. The result is a conditional population posterior with its uncertainty and claim boundary kept visible.

See observed become intrinsic →

OBSERVED

114,105

searched stars

MODEL-INFERRED

78.3

effective stars

MODEL-INFERRED

0.692

planets per star

Computed ranking

Leading candidates

Produced by the pipeline, not selected by hand. The intervals are 16th–84th percentiles from 4,000 Monte Carlo draws per planet.

Top eight Earth-2.0 candidates with component scores, Earth Similarity Index posteriors, mass evidence and distance
#PlanetEarth-2.0 indexEarth Similarity IndexHabitable zoneMassRadiusDistance
1Proxima Cen bM5.5 V0.876HZ 100%M sin i1.02 R⊕1.3 pc / 4.2 ly
2GJ 1061 dM5.5 V0.875HZ 100%measured1.16 R⊕3.7 pc / 12.0 ly
3GJ 1002 bM5.5 V0.849HZ 100%M sin i1.03 R⊕4.8 pc / 15.8 ly
4Wolf 1069 bM5.0 V0.839HZ 100%M sin i1.08 R⊕9.6 pc / 31.3 ly
5Teegarden's Star cM7.0 V0.823HZ 100%M sin i1.02 R⊕3.8 pc / 12.5 ly
6Kepler-1649 c0.774HZ 96%inferred1.06 R⊕92.2 pc / 300.7 ly
7GJ 1002 cM5.5 V0.771HZ 96%M sin i1.10 R⊕4.8 pc / 15.8 ly
8Kepler-1229 b0.716HZ 100%inferred1.40 R⊕265.5 pc / 865.9 ly
Why the ranking looks like this

47%

of catalogue masses were never measured

2,975 planets carry a mass predicted from their radius by a mass–radius relation. Density and escape velocity computed from such a mass re-encode the radius rather than adding information, so the Earth Similarity Index would appear to combine four independent properties while being driven by one.

0.92

Venus scores 0.92 on the Earth Similarity Index

Venus’s high albedo makes its equilibrium temperature cooler than Earth’s, and equilibrium temperature is the only temperature exoplanet catalogues provide. An ESI built on data that exists for real exoplanets cannot separate an Earth from a Venus. Venus runs through the whole pipeline as a control so this is visible rather than asserted.

~1 ppm

is an Earth twin’s atmospheric signal

For a real nitrogen–oxygen atmosphere around a Sun-like star, the transmission signal is about one part per million — against a current best precision of tens of ppm. Finding an Earth twin and characterising its atmosphere are separated by a generation of instruments.

Every number on this site traces back to a source.

89,131 measurement links · 1,814 publications · 66,228 with ADS bibcodes · 11,736 values calculated by the archive rather than measured

Data source trail →
Data coverage

What looks measured, and what is actually quantified

The pale bar is how many planets have a value at all. The solid bar is how many have that value with a published uncertainty. The gap between them is the part of the catalogue that looks measured but cannot be propagated — and it is large.

What this analysis cannot establish →
  • Stellar mass100% / 96%
  • System distance100% / 98%
  • Planet mass100% / 48%
  • Planet radius99% / 69%
  • Bulk density98% / 23%
  • Stellar effective temperature95% / 90%
  • Stellar luminosity95% / 61%
  • Stellar radius95% / 91%
  • Orbital period95% / 87%
  • Semi-major axis93% / 62%