Finding Earth 2.0
Proxima Cen · M5.5 V

Proxima Cen b

Rank #1 of the ranked catalogue · Discovered by Radial Velocity in 2016

HZ 100%M sin i

0.876

Earth-2.0 index

rank #1

0.915

Earth Similarity Index

0.897–0.932 (68% CI)

100%

Conservative HZ probability

1.02 R⊕

Radius

mass: msini_lower_limit

At a glance

Proxima Cen lies 4.24 light-years (1.301 pc) from the Sun. Proxima Cen is a M5.5 V star with 0.122× the Sun's mass and 0.141× its radius (effective temperature 2900 K, versus the Sun's 5772 K). It is one of 3 stars in this system hosting 2 known planets. Proxima Cen b is 1.02× Earth's radius, at least 1.05× Earth's mass (a radial-velocity minimum mass, not the true mass), completing one orbit every 11.2 days at 0.0485 AU. It receives about 0.64× the flux Earth gets from the Sun, for an equilibrium temperature near 227 K (Earth's is 254 K).

Orbit and habitable-zone boundaries computed in Python from this system’s actual parameters. Sizes and the overall scale are compressed for visibility, not literal; green = conservative HZ, gold = optimistic HZ.

Planet parameters
Radius1.020 R⊕
Mass1.055 M⊕M sin iRadial-velocity minimum mass: the true mass is M/sin(i), so this is a LOWER limit.
Bulk density5.460 g/cm³source: catalogue
Escape velocity11.38 km/s
Orbital period11.1846 days
Semi-major axis0.04848 au
Eccentricity0.000
Incident flux0.641 S⊕source: catalogue
Equilibrium temperature227.4 KBond albedo assumed: 0.306. Equilibrium temperature excludes greenhouse warming by construction. Earth's is 254 K against a 288 K surface.
Host star
NameProxima Cen
Spectral typeM5.5 V
Effective temperature2900 K
Radius0.141 R☉
Mass0.122 M☉
Luminosity10^-2.821 L☉
Metallicity [Fe/H]
Age
Distance1.3 pc / 4.2 ly
Multiplicity3 star(s), 2 known planet(s)
Gaia DR3 cross-check
Parallax distance1.30 pc0.06% vs. archive-adopted distance
RUWE0.971
Habitable zone
Boundary modelKopparapu et al. (2013), ApJ 765, 131, with the 2013 erratum coefficients
BoundaryS_eff (Earth units)
recent venus1.4918
runaway greenhouse0.8629
moist greenhouse0.8521
maximum greenhouse0.2291
early mars0.2020
Atmospheric spectroscopy

No published transmission spectrum exists for this planet in the NASA Exoplanet Archive.

Transit analysis

Planet is not flagged as transiting; a light curve cannot show a transit.

Radial-velocity analysis
Measurements620baseline 18.1 yr across 4 instrument(s)
Activity coincidences0RV periodogram peaks matching a stellar-activity indicator period
Fitted semi-amplitude1.31 ± 0.03 m/sM sin i = 1.13 M⊕
Measurement sources
ParameterValueSource
Planet radius1.0200archive-calculated (not a publication)
Planet mass1.0550Suárez Mascareño et al. 2025
Orbital period11.1846Suárez Mascareño et al. 2025
Semi-major axis0.0485Suárez Mascareño et al. 2025
Incident flux0.6410Suárez Mascareño et al. 2025
Equilibrium temperature218.0000Suárez Mascareño et al. 2025
Bulk density5.4600archive-calculated (not a publication)
Orbital eccentricity0.0000Suárez Mascareño et al. 2025
Stellar effective temperature2900.0000Suárez Mascareño et al. 2025
Stellar radius0.1410Suárez Mascareño et al. 2025
Stellar mass0.1221Suárez Mascareño et al. 2025
Stellar luminosity-2.8210Suárez Mascareño et al. 2025
System distance1.3012TICv8

Component scores

Earth similarity

0.915

Conservative habitability

0.946

Observational confidence

0.730

Characterisation potential

Evidence

Independent references
5
Published parameter sets
5
Composite parameter sources
3 · mixed
Default-solution coverage
83%
Composite ↔ default difference
0% median
Uncertainty coverage
83%
Discovery method
Radial Velocity
Discovery year
2016

The archive composite selects values from multiple publications. This is disclosed separately and is not automatically penalised.

Observability

TSM
n/a (non-transiting)
RV semi-amplitude (expected)
1.226 m/s
Transit-time σ at 2030
Max angular separation
37.26 mas
Reflected-light contrast
7.68e-8

Follow-up lanes are diagnostics, not ranking inputs. Reflected light assumes Ag = 0.30 and Lambertian quadrature.

Identifiers

system_name
alf Cen

Other planets in this system

Add to comparison →

Any rendering of this world is a scientifically informed visualisation, not an image. No exoplanet has been imaged at surface resolution. Surface and cloud appearance are illustrative of a physically plausible class, not observations.