Finding Earth 2.0
GJ 1002 · M5.5 V

GJ 1002 c

Rank #7 of the ranked catalogue · Discovered by Radial Velocity in 2022

HZ 96%M sin i

0.771

Earth-2.0 index

rank #7

0.751

Earth Similarity Index

0.737–0.763 (68% CI)

96%

Conservative HZ probability

1.10 R⊕

Radius

mass: msini_lower_limit

At a glance

GJ 1002 lies 15.81 light-years (4.849 pc) from the Sun. GJ 1002 is a M5.5 V star with 0.12× the Sun's mass and 0.137× its radius (effective temperature 3024 K, versus the Sun's 5772 K). It is a single star hosting 2 known planets. GJ 1002 c is 1.1× Earth's radius, at least 1.36× Earth's mass (a radial-velocity minimum mass, not the true mass), completing one orbit every 21.2 days at 0.0738 AU. It receives about 0.26× the flux Earth gets from the Sun, for an equilibrium temperature near 181 K (Earth's is 254 K).

Orbit and habitable-zone boundaries computed in Python from this system’s actual parameters. Sizes and the overall scale are compressed for visibility, not literal; green = conservative HZ, gold = optimistic HZ.

Planet parameters
Radius1.100 R⊕
Mass1.360 M⊕M sin iRadial-velocity minimum mass: the true mass is M/sin(i), so this is a LOWER limit.
Bulk density5.610 g/cm³source: catalogue
Escape velocity12.44 km/s
Orbital period21.2020 days
Semi-major axis0.07380 au
Eccentricity
Incident flux0.257 S⊕source: catalogue
Equilibrium temperature181.0 KBond albedo assumed: 0.306. Equilibrium temperature excludes greenhouse warming by construction. Earth's is 254 K against a 288 K surface.
Host star
NameGJ 1002
Spectral typeM5.5 V
Effective temperature3024 K
Radius0.137 R☉
Mass0.120 M☉
Luminosity10^-2.852 L☉
Metallicity [Fe/H]-0.250
Age
Distance4.8 pc / 15.8 ly
Multiplicity1 star(s), 2 known planet(s)
Gaia DR3 cross-check
Parallax distance4.85 pc0.05% vs. archive-adopted distance
RUWE1.337
Habitable zone
Boundary modelKopparapu et al. (2013), ApJ 765, 131, with the 2013 erratum coefficients
BoundaryS_eff (Earth units)
recent venus1.4979
runaway greenhouse0.8650
moist greenhouse0.8556
maximum greenhouse0.2322
early mars0.2055
Atmospheric spectroscopy

No published transmission spectrum exists for this planet in the NASA Exoplanet Archive.

Transit analysis

Planet is not flagged as transiting; a light curve cannot show a transit.

Radial-velocity analysis
Measurements66baseline 19.0 yr across 3 instrument(s)
Activity coincidences3RV periodogram peaks matching a stellar-activity indicator period
Fitted semi-amplitude1.17 ± 0.11 m/sM sin i = 1.23 M⊕
Measurement sources
ParameterValueSource
Planet radius1.1000archive-calculated (not a publication)
Planet mass1.3600Suárez Mascareño et al. 2023
Orbital period21.2020Suárez Mascareño et al. 2023
Semi-major axis0.0738Suárez Mascareño et al. 2023
Incident flux0.2570Suárez Mascareño et al. 2023
Equilibrium temperature181.7000Suárez Mascareño et al. 2023
Bulk density5.6100archive-calculated (not a publication)
Stellar effective temperature3024.0000Suárez Mascareño et al. 2023
Stellar radius0.1370Suárez Mascareño et al. 2023
Stellar mass0.1200Suárez Mascareño et al. 2023
Stellar luminosity-2.8520Suárez Mascareño et al. 2023
Stellar metallicity-0.2500Suárez Mascareño et al. 2023
System distance4.8487TICv8

Component scores

Earth similarity

0.751

Conservative habitability

0.883

Observational confidence

0.644

Characterisation potential

Evidence

Independent references
1
Published parameter sets
1
Composite parameter sources
3 · mixed
Default-solution coverage
82%
Composite ↔ default difference
0% median
Uncertainty coverage
83%
Discovery method
Radial Velocity
Discovery year
2022

The archive composite selects values from multiple publications. This is disclosed separately and is not automatically penalised.

Observability

TSM
n/a (non-transiting)
RV semi-amplitude (expected)
1.292 m/s
Transit-time σ at 2030
Max angular separation
15.22 mas
Reflected-light contrast
3.86e-8

Follow-up lanes are diagnostics, not ranking inputs. Reflected light assumes Ag = 0.30 and Lambertian quadrature.

Identifiers

system_name
GJ 1002

Other planets in this system

Add to comparison →

Any rendering of this world is a scientifically informed visualisation, not an image. No exoplanet has been imaged at surface resolution. Surface and cloud appearance are illustrative of a physically plausible class, not observations.