Exoplanet Atmosphere Report · JWST NIRSpec/G395H Phase Curve
An ultra-hot Jupiter so close to its star that its dayside glows hot enough to vaporize rock and metal, with a nightside measured well over 1000 K cooler. This page extracts that day-night divide from a JWST phase-resolved spectroscopy dataset, propagating each point's own posterior uncertainty rather than reporting a bare difference of averages.
AI-generated artist's concept of WASP-121 b — not a real photograph. All data and figures in this report come from actual JWST NIRSpec/G395H phase-curve observations (see below).
Queried live from the NASA Exoplanet Archive TAP service (pscomppars).
| Radius | 19.53 Earth radii (~1.74 Jupiter radii) |
|---|---|
| Mass | 371.9 Earth masses (~1.17 Jupiter masses) |
| Orbital period | 1.27 days — one of the shortest known for a giant planet |
| Semi-major axis | 0.0257 AU |
| Equilibrium temperature | 2409 K |
| Host star | WASP-121, F-type dwarf, Teff = 6628 K, 1.46 Rsun, 1.33 Msun |
| Distance | 269.9 parsecs (~880 light-years) |
| Discovery | 2016, transit photometry (WASP survey) |
At 2409 K equilibrium temperature and orbiting so close its shape is measurably tidally distorted, WASP-121 b sits at the extreme end of hot-Jupiter irradiation. Earlier HST work (Evans et al. 2017, 2018) found evidence for a stratospheric temperature inversion and metal oxide absorption (vanadium oxide) on its dayside — the atmospheric equivalent of Earth's ozone layer, but from a completely different chemistry driven by extreme heat rather than UV-absorbing ozone.
More recent JWST phase-curve spectroscopy (the data behind this report) tracks how the planet's emitted spectrum changes continuously as different hemispheres rotate into view across a full orbit, directly measuring how efficiently (or poorly) the atmosphere moves heat from the permanently irradiated dayside to the nightside.
The top panel keeps NRS1 and NRS2 separate and averages the released planet/star flux ratios within each detector band at every phase. A first harmonic is overlaid only as a compact descriptive summary. The lower panels compare brightness-temperature spectra in phase windows nearest eclipse and transit. This separation matters: flux ratio is the measured observable, whereas brightness temperature is a wavelength-dependent transformation and its average is not an energy-budget temperature.
scripts/analyze_spectrum.py.The first-harmonic conjunction estimates are 3915/158 ppm (NRS1) and 4910/620 ppm (NRS2), closely tracking the published broadband values from the same observation. This is a reproducibility cross-check, not independent confirmation. Reduced χ² values of 14.36 and 13.07 show that a first harmonic and diagonal channel errors are not adequate for inference; the peak locations therefore have no new physical uncertainty or detection significance attached here. The 1493.2 ± 3.8 K wavelength-averaged monochromatic contrast is likewise not a bolometric hemisphere temperature. For energy-budget work, use an analysis that models unobserved wavelengths, such as the cited NIRISS/SOSS result (2717 ± 17 K dayside, 1562 ± 19 K nightside).
System parameters come from the NASA Exoplanet Archive TAP service. Seven numerical products are pinned to Zenodo v8 (record 10.5281/zenodo.20651891): phase and wavelength grids, flux-ratio values/errors, and brightness-temperature values with asymmetric errors. See source provenance, the analysis, machine-readable summary, and derived phase curves. Source identities and matrix shapes are checked by scripts/validate_data.py. Inter-channel covariance is unavailable; diagonal formal errors are not treated as physical parameter uncertainties.