Exoplanet Atmosphere Report · JWST NIRSpec/PRISM
One of the most Earth-like planets known by size and insolation, orbiting an ultracool dwarf 12.4 parsecs away, and one of JWST's highest-priority habitable-zone targets. This page tests its own decontaminated NIRSpec/PRISM transmission spectrum for flatness and reports the result next to Espinoza et al. (2025)'s published atmosphere constraints.
AI-generated artist's concept of TRAPPIST-1 e — not a real photograph. All data and figures in this report come from actual JWST NIRSpec/PRISM observations (see below).
Queried live from the NASA Exoplanet Archive TAP service (pscomppars).
| Radius | 0.92 Earth radii |
|---|---|
| Mass | 0.69 Earth masses |
| Orbital period | 6.10 days |
| Semi-major axis | 0.0293 AU |
| Equilibrium temperature | 249.7 K (within the conventional habitable zone for its ultracool host) |
| Host star | TRAPPIST-1, ultracool M8V dwarf, Teff = 2566 K, 0.119 Rsun, 0.090 Msun |
| Distance | 12.4 parsecs (~40.5 light-years) |
| Discovery | 2017, transit photometry (TRAPPIST + Spitzer + K2) |
TRAPPIST-1 is a system of seven roughly Earth-sized rocky planets around an ultracool M dwarf, discovered by the TRAPPIST, Spitzer, and K2 surveys and refined through years of follow-up. Planet e sits in the conventional habitable zone, and its small, cool, nearby host star gives an unusually favorable transit depth for atmospheric spectroscopy on a rocky planet — one of the reasons it's a flagship JWST target despite its Earth-like size.
Espinoza et al. (2025), part of the JWST-TST DREAMS program, combined four NIRSpec/PRISM transits of TRAPPIST-1e and corrected the resulting spectrum for contamination from unocculted starspots and faculae on the host star — a real, significant systematic for any planet transiting an active M dwarf, since spots and faculae imprint their own wavelength-dependent signal on the transit depth independent of the planet's atmosphere.
AI-generated 3D-render-style concept — one of several atmosphere scenarios still statistically consistent with the flat spectrum below, not a confirmed depiction.
The figure separates three questions: the diagonal constant fit to the final GP-decontaminated spectrum; the weighted mean transit depth from six reductions of each visit; and the residual structure left by a constant-depth model. The six reductions of a visit share the same observation and are not independent replicates.
scripts/analyze_spectrum.py.The final product does not reject a fitted constant under this diagonal-error likelihood. Its reduced χ² of 0.649 and standardized-residual RMS of 0.800 may reflect conservative marginal errors and/or covariance that this calculation omits; p = 0.988 is not proof that no atmosphere exists. Across all six reductions, visit 104 is lower than visits 001–003; its median weighted depth is 4715.2 ppm, 360.2 ppm below the median of the earlier visit medians, and its between-pipeline range reaches 160.0 ppm. This is a visit-level systematic-sensitivity diagnostic, not a planetary-atmosphere detection. Espinoza et al. (2025)'s full retrieval—not this audit—rules out cloudy primary atmospheres with at least 80% H2 by volume at better than 3σ.
System parameters come from the NASA Exoplanet Archive TAP service. The final product and the 24 pipeline/visit tables come from the authors' Zenodo archive—see data/SOURCE.md and the pipeline-product provenance. The complete audit is in scripts/analyze_spectrum.py; machine-readable results are available as JSON and CSV. These descriptive diagonal-error fits neither reproduce the paper's covariance model nor perform atmospheric retrieval or model selection.
AI-generated illustration of the James Webb Space Telescope, whose NIRSpec instrument took the real PRISM transit spectra used in this report. Not an official mission photograph — see NASA/JWST for real imagery.