Exoplanet Atmosphere Report · JWST NIRSpec/G395H

LHS 475b

An Earth-sized rocky planet interior to its M-dwarf's habitable zone, and one of JWST's first terrestrial-exoplanet targets. This report statistically tests the real, published transmission spectrum against real candidate atmosphere models — showing exactly which are ruled out and which remain possible.

Transit-discovered, 2023 (TESS + JWST validation) Real NASA Exoplanet Archive parameters Real JWST NIRSpec spectrum (Lustig-Yaeger & Fu et al. 2023)
Artist's concept of the Earth-sized rocky exoplanet LHS 475 b

AI-generated artist's concept of LHS 475b — not a real photograph. All data and figures in this report come from actual JWST NIRSpec observations (see below).

The planet, in numbers

Queried live from the NASA Exoplanet Archive TAP service (pscomppars).

Radius0.991 Earth radii — essentially Earth-sized
Mass0.941 Earth masses
Orbital period2.029 days
Semi-major axis0.0204 AU
Equilibrium temperature586 K — warm, interior to the habitable zone
Host starLHS 475, M3 dwarf, Teff = 3300 K, 0.279 Rsun, 0.262 Msun
Distance12.48 parsecs (~40.7 light-years)
Discovery2023, TESS transit photometry; independently validated with JWST

Why a "featureless" spectrum is still a real, useful result

A rocky planet's transmission spectrum shows wavelength-dependent absorption dips only if starlight is passing through a real, extended, molecule-bearing atmosphere during transit. A flat, feature-free spectrum is not a non-result — it actively rules out entire classes of atmosphere, the same way a flat line on a metal detector rules out large buried objects. JWST's precision (constraining features below 50 parts per million here) makes this a genuinely stringent test, something no previous facility could do for a planet this small.

Lustig-Yaeger & Fu et al. (2023) used two real JWST NIRSpec/G395H transit observations to independently validate LHS 475b's existence and obtain its first transmission spectrum, finding no significant molecular features and using that flatness to rule out specific real candidate atmospheres.

Close-up 3D-rendered concept of LHS 475 b's rocky surface

AI-generated 3D-render-style concept — one of several atmosphere scenarios still statistically consistent with the flat spectrum above, not a confirmed depiction.

Real statistical test, quantified

The left panel shows the real 56-point JWST spectrum with a fitted flat line; the right panel shows the reduced chi-squared of the real data against four real published candidate atmosphere models (PICASO/CHIMERA forward models, offset to the measured depth).

LHS 475b real JWST NIRSpec transmission spectrum and model comparison chi-squared bar chart
Left: real data vs. an inverse-variance-weighted flat-line fit. Right: reduced chi-squared per real candidate model. Generated by scripts/analyze_spectrum.py.
Testχ² / dofreduced χ²p-value
Flat line50.70 / 550.920.640
Pure CH4 (methane)128.69 / 562.301.2×10⁻⁷ — disfavored
1x-solar H2-rich11541.08 / 56206.1<10⁻³⁰⁰ — decisively disfavored
Clear Venus-like (CO2)62.90 / 561.120.245 — consistent
Pure CO257.58 / 561.030.416 — consistent

The spectrum is statistically indistinguishable from a flat line (chi-squared of 50.70 over 55 degrees of freedom, p = 0.640) — evidence against thick, spectrally active atmospheres. Against the model-comparison p-values: a primordial hydrogen-dominated envelope is decisively rejected, and a cloudless pure-methane atmosphere is disfavored at high confidence (p = 1.2×10⁻⁷), while denser, higher-mean-molecular-weight options like a CO2-dominated, Venus-like atmosphere remain statistically consistent with the data (p = 0.245 and 0.416) — matching the published conclusion that the data cannot yet distinguish a thick CO2 atmosphere, a thin Mars-like one, or bare rock. These p-values assume each model is fixed with no locally fit free parameters (the models were already offset to the measured depth upstream), so dof = N for the model comparisons and N-1 for the flat-line fit, which itself fits one free parameter.

Data and method notes

System parameters were queried live from the NASA Exoplanet Archive TAP service. The transmission spectrum and atmosphere models come from Zenodo record 7925111 (Lustig-Yaeger & Fu et al. 2023) — see data/ for the exact files as downloaded and scripts/analyze_spectrum.py for the chi-squared analysis (python scripts/analyze_spectrum.py to rerun it). The webpage described the models as "offset to the measured depth" — that offset is already baked into the upstream Zenodo model files this repo uses, not something this script fits itself, and is documented here rather than left implicit. This repo also compares only 4 of the paper's roughly 12 candidate models (a representative disfavored pair and a representative consistent pair), and a "consistent" p-value here means the data cannot rule the model out — not that it confirms it; a genuinely featureless spectrum is equally consistent with several very different atmospheres, or none at all.

AI-generated illustration of the James Webb Space Telescope

AI-generated illustration of the James Webb Space Telescope, whose NIRSpec instrument took the real spectrum used in this report. Not an official mission photograph — see NASA/JWST for real imagery.

References

  1. Lustig-Yaeger, J. & Fu, G. et al., 2023. A JWST transmission spectrum of the nearby Earth-sized exoplanet LHS 475 b. Nature Astronomy, 7, pp.1317-1328.
  2. Ment, K. et al., 2023. LHS 475 b: A Venus-sized Planet Orbiting a Nearby M Dwarf. The Astronomical Journal (submitted), arXiv:2304.01920.
  3. NASA Exoplanet Archive, exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu — system parameters, queried live via TAP.
  4. Zenodo record 7925111, zenodo.org/records/7925111 — real reduced JWST spectrum and atmosphere models.