Exp-H tested the limit of temperature-only feedback over a multi-hour interval with optical path length (OPL), environmental and detector-plane measurements evaluated together. The purpose was to determine whether thermal correction could keep the image motion bounded under a strong refractive-index disturbance envelope, and to identify the residual that a second correction layer would need to address.
| Quantity | Warm-up | Feedback | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
RMS dY |
0.79 px | 0.83 px | Detector-plane motion remained comparable to the warm-up scale over the selected long-run comparison. |
RMS dX |
- | 0.16 px | Cross-axis motion stayed smaller than the dominant dY response. |
| RMS OPL residual | 0.77 µm | 6.47 µm | OPL residual increased under the environmental disturbance, despite bounded pixel motion. |
| Pressure span | - | ~5.14 hPa | Strong pressure forcing for a temperature-only control experiment. |
| Approximate duration | - | ~8 h | Long-run stress-test window. |
| Feedback updates | - | 19 | Event-based thermal corrections during the selected run. |
The main result is not that temperature control removed all optical-path variation. It did not: the OPL residual remained sensitive to pressure- and humidity-driven refractivity changes. Rather, Exp-H showed that the temperature loop could maintain first-order image-plane stability under a disturbance envelope far larger than that of the earlier short, quiet tests.
This makes Exp-H a useful temperature-only benchmark. It also defines the reason for the later hierarchy: TEC control handles the slow, coarse component of drift, while a separate fine actuator is needed for residual image motion that cannot be efficiently absorbed by thermal correction alone.
The values above describe the explicitly selected warm-up and feedback windows used in the benchmark analysis. They should not be read as a release of raw telemetry or as a claim that every section of the full run had identical stability.