Master-Thesis-2024

Exp-H: Long-run OPL + pixel feedback benchmark

Exp-H benchmark

Aim

Exp-H tested the limit of temperature-only feedback over a multi-hour interval with optical path length (OPL), environmental and detector-plane measurements evaluated together. The purpose was to determine whether thermal correction could keep the image motion bounded under a strong refractive-index disturbance envelope, and to identify the residual that a second correction layer would need to address.

Selected comparison

Quantity Warm-up Feedback Reading
RMS dY 0.79 px 0.83 px Detector-plane motion remained comparable to the warm-up scale over the selected long-run comparison.
RMS dX - 0.16 px Cross-axis motion stayed smaller than the dominant dY response.
RMS OPL residual 0.77 µm 6.47 µm OPL residual increased under the environmental disturbance, despite bounded pixel motion.
Pressure span - ~5.14 hPa Strong pressure forcing for a temperature-only control experiment.
Approximate duration - ~8 h Long-run stress-test window.
Feedback updates - 19 Event-based thermal corrections during the selected run.

Interpretation

The main result is not that temperature control removed all optical-path variation. It did not: the OPL residual remained sensitive to pressure- and humidity-driven refractivity changes. Rather, Exp-H showed that the temperature loop could maintain first-order image-plane stability under a disturbance envelope far larger than that of the earlier short, quiet tests.

This makes Exp-H a useful temperature-only benchmark. It also defines the reason for the later hierarchy: TEC control handles the slow, coarse component of drift, while a separate fine actuator is needed for residual image motion that cannot be efficiently absorbed by thermal correction alone.

Reporting note

The values above describe the explicitly selected warm-up and feedback windows used in the benchmark analysis. They should not be read as a release of raw telemetry or as a claim that every section of the full run had identical stability.