{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "verified_date": "2026-09-25",
  "programme": {
    "title": "Top-50 research upgrade programme",
    "audited_repositories": 121,
    "eligible_first_party": 115,
    "ranked_queue": 50,
    "completed": 18,
    "policy": "A repository is complete only after a scoped research question, generated evidence, explicit limitations, automated validation, a public release, and live-link verification."
  },
  "repositories": [
    {
      "rank": 1,
      "slug": "eprv-spectrograph-landscape",
      "title": "EPRV Spectrograph Landscape",
      "version": "v0.15.0",
      "source_ref": "67a0f50",
      "research_question": "How strongly does resolving power improve the local photon-limited Doppler bound as intrinsic stellar line width changes?",
      "principal_result": "Increasing resolving power from 100,000 to 150,000 improves the controlled bound by 37.1%, 11.1%, and 2.48% for intrinsic Gaussian widths of 1.0, 2.5, and 5.0 km/s. The broad-line null below 10% is not rejected.",
      "evidence": ["15 controlled scenarios", "4,000 seeded recoveries", "27 tests", "Python 3.10/3.12/3.13 CI"],
      "before_score": 63,
      "after_score": 92,
      "claim_boundary": "A local synthetic photon-information experiment, not an end-to-end instrument performance forecast.",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/eprv-spectrograph-landscape",
      "release_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/eprv-spectrograph-landscape/releases/tag/v0.15.0",
      "live_url": "https://biswajit1999.github.io/eprv-spectrograph-landscape/"
    },
    {
      "rank": 4,
      "slug": "exolight-transit-lab",
      "title": "ExoLight Transit Lab",
      "version": "v1.4.0",
      "source_ref": "3230f3a",
      "research_question": "How badly can correlated time-series noise invalidate iid transit-depth uncertainties, and can event-clustered intervals restore coverage?",
      "principal_result": "With AR(1) correlation ρ=0.8, nominal 95% iid coverage falls to 54.9% and 56.1% for deep and shallow injections; event-clustered intervals reach 93.2% and 92.1%.",
      "evidence": ["4 controlled scenarios", "4,000 seeded recoveries", "deterministic reports", "Scientific core, frontend, and Pages CI"],
      "before_score": 58,
      "after_score": 95,
      "claim_boundary": "A controlled noise-model experiment, not proof that every observed transit has AR(1) residuals or that clustered errors solve all red-noise structure.",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/exolight-transit-lab",
      "release_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/exolight-transit-lab/releases/tag/v1.4.0",
      "live_url": "https://biswajit1999.github.io/exolight-transit-lab/"
    },
    {
      "rank": 5,
      "slug": "exohspec-thar-atlas",
      "title": "EXOhSPEC Th–Ar Atlas",
      "version": "v0.3.0",
      "source_ref": "f38488e",
      "research_question": "Can a multi-exposure ladder preserve strong calibration-feature centroids better than a single long exposure without degrading faint features?",
      "principal_result": "Across 7,000 strong-feature injections, pixelwise HDR lowers centroid RMSE from 0.012954 to 0.002086 pixel, an 83.9% reduction; faint-feature RMSE remains unchanged.",
      "evidence": ["24 measured feature strengths", "24,000 seeded recoveries", "6 tests", "Python 3.10/3.12/3.13 CI"],
      "before_score": 52,
      "after_score": 93,
      "claim_boundary": "A detector-domain simulation in pixels, not an atomic identification, wavelength solution, or measured radial-velocity precision.",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/exohspec-thar-atlas",
      "release_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/exohspec-thar-atlas/releases/tag/v0.3.0",
      "live_url": "https://biswajit1999.github.io/exohspec-thar-atlas/"
    },
    {
      "rank": 6,
      "slug": "Biswajit_Jana.github.io",
      "title": "Research Portfolio Evidence Registry",
      "version": "v2026.09.24.3",
      "source_ref": "v2026.09.24.3",
      "research_question": "Can a large research portfolio expose questions, generated results, validation, releases, and limitations in one reviewer-auditable layer?",
      "principal_result": "The first sixteen completed upgrades are represented by one validated schema and a deterministic public registry, while the page states that 34 ranked repositories remain unfinished.",
      "evidence": ["121 repositories audited", "50-repository ranked queue", "schema validation", "deterministic HTML build and CI"],
      "before_score": 60,
      "after_score": 95,
      "claim_boundary": "The registry records verified project evidence and upgrade completeness; it is not a citation index, peer-review decision, or ranking of scientific importance.",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/Biswajit_Jana.github.io",
      "release_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/Biswajit_Jana.github.io/releases/tag/v2026.09.24.3",
      "live_url": "https://biswajit1999.github.io/Biswajit_Jana.github.io/research-evidence.html"
    },
    {
      "rank": 7,
      "slug": "lattice-radiation-twin",
      "title": "LATTICE Radiation Twin",
      "version": "v0.2.0",
      "source_ref": "a154e65",
      "research_question": "Can eight historical HST epochs distinguish calendar time from four cumulative radiation proxy components well enough to interpret individual coefficients?",
      "principal_result": "The component-attribution gate fails: six parameters leave two residual degrees of freedom, the standardized condition number is 175.31, maximum VIF is 4,881.4, and three exposure coefficients change sign under leave-one-epoch-out refits.",
      "evidence": ["8 independent epochs", "4 identifiability diagnostics", "82 tests", "Scientific and Pages CI"],
      "before_score": 83,
      "after_score": 98,
      "claim_boundary": "A post hoc design diagnostic of predictor separability, not a radiation-damage estimate, causal claim, or authorization to open the sealed temporal holdout.",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/lattice-radiation-twin",
      "release_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/lattice-radiation-twin/releases/tag/v0.2.0",
      "live_url": "https://biswajit1999.github.io/lattice-radiation-twin/"
    },
    {
      "rank": 8,
      "slug": "finding-earth-2",
      "title": "Finding Earth 2.0",
      "version": "v2.1.2",
      "source_ref": "46d4fe4",
      "research_question": "When the scientific objective is reducing planet-radius uncertainty, can a larger scalar stellar-radius information score justify an indirect observation without measured covariance?",
      "principal_result": "Thirteen targets support both actions. Stellar radius has the larger own-parameter score for 10, but the indirect route wins for none at |rho| <= 0.90; Kepler-296 f requires |rho| = 0.995225 to break even.",
      "evidence": ["13-target objective-conditioned audit", "295 tests and 63% coverage", "67 scientific invariants and 26/26 release gates", "Deterministic 68-file publication bundle (SHA-256 1A69ECA68DD600373B80D2177468D663D4FD2CFBF81E434D88F2A9CCA5DFBAE3)", "Gaia-preserving scheduled-refresh evidence contract"],
      "before_score": 93,
      "after_score": 99,
      "claim_boundary": "The correlation grid is a sensitivity analysis, not a measured joint posterior or an instrument-time recommendation; exposure cost remains unmodelled.",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/finding-earth-2",
      "release_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/finding-earth-2/releases/tag/v2.1.2",
      "live_url": "https://biswajit1999.github.io/finding-earth-2/information-gain/"
    },
    {
      "rank": 9,
      "slug": "AstroBis",
      "title": "AstroBis Small-Body Evidence",
      "version": "v1.3.1",
      "source_ref": "1aa1ef0",
      "research_question": "How sensitive is a 0.05 AU and 140 m close-approach screen to JPL distance intervals, missing diameters, assumed albedo, and row-limited query coverage?",
      "principal_result": "The reviewed 7,500-row chronological prefix contains 586 nominal-close approaches, of which 396 remain close at the three-sigma maximum distance; 190 nominal-close rows cross the distance boundary. Only 235 rows have measured diameters, and 61 nominal-close rows are albedo-sensitive around the 140 m screen.",
      "evidence": ["7,500 of 39,427 matching JPL CAD rows with explicit 19.0% coverage", "235 measured diameters and 7,263 H-derived sensitivity intervals", "Six numerical regression tests and deterministic JSON/CSV/SVG products", "Cross-platform canonical-LF input SHA-256 633cee41d8cbab84f8ed037106b15b36088abce4bcca4c767df6e826d8f679b1", "Node 24 validation, static build, Pages gate, and zero npm vulnerabilities"],
      "before_score": 39,
      "after_score": 96,
      "claim_boundary": "This is a row-limited encounter-screening sensitivity audit. JPL CAD distance is not MOID, albedo cases are not object-level posteriors, and the result is not a PHA designation, impact probability, Torino score, or hazard assessment.",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/AstroBis",
      "release_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/AstroBis/releases/tag/v1.3.1",
      "live_url": "https://biswajit1999.github.io/AstroBis/neo/"
    },
    {
      "rank": 10,
      "slug": "Biswajit1999",
      "title": "GitHub Profile Evidence Index",
      "version": "v1.1.0",
      "source_ref": "96204e3",
      "research_question": "Can a GitHub profile distinguish reviewer-auditable research evidence from general portfolio discovery while keeping every concise claim traceable to a versioned source?",
      "principal_result": "Seven upstream records now route each research question and generated result to an exact source revision, versioned release, live evidence surface, and project-specific boundary; discovery-only links are explicitly excluded from that verified set.",
      "evidence": ["Seven pinned upstream evidence records", "Deterministic JSON-to-Markdown/CSV/SVG build", "Five schema, freshness, traceability, uniqueness, and boundary tests", "Node 24 CI and zero dependency vulnerabilities", "All 21 repository/release/live evidence URLs verified HTTP 200", "Four release assets with GitHub-verified SHA-256 digests"],
      "before_score": 36,
      "after_score": 95,
      "claim_boundary": "The maturity score measures auditable research communication, not scientific merit, peer review, citation impact, applicant ranking, or independent verification of biographical profile statements.",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/Biswajit1999",
      "release_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/Biswajit1999/releases/tag/v1.1.0",
      "live_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999"
    },
    {
      "rank": 11,
      "slug": "spectral-noise-budget-studio",
      "title": "Spectral Noise Budget Studio",
      "version": "v1.1.0",
      "source_ref": "1791a8c",
      "research_question": "At four declared molecular feature wavelengths, which committed JWST/NIRCam profiles retain at least half of peak response?",
      "principal_result": "Across 16 feature/filter comparisons, four are in the half-power core, one is an edge placement, and eleven are outside useful sampled response. CH₄ at 3.30 μm in F277W retains about 0.026% of peak response, a 3,805× source-photon-limited relative-time proxy.",
      "evidence": ["3,192 committed SVO throughput samples with source SHA-256 receipts", "16-row deterministic JSON and CSV audit", "Linear interpolation, pivot wavelength, and equivalent-width calculations", "13 data-contract, numerical-property, and headline-result tests", "Node 24 CI, Pages deployment, and zero dependency vulnerabilities", "Four release assets with GitHub-verified SHA-256 digests"],
      "before_score": 44,
      "after_score": 95,
      "claim_boundary": "A pre-ETC passband-placement audit. The relative-time ratio is not a JWST exposure-time or molecular-detectability prediction, and broadband imaging does not isolate a monochromatic feature.",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/spectral-noise-budget-studio",
      "release_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/spectral-noise-budget-studio/releases/tag/v1.1.0",
      "live_url": "https://biswajit1999.github.io/spectral-noise-budget-studio/"
    },
    {
      "rank": 12,
      "slug": "Jana-s-RV-Doppler-Observatory",
      "title": "Jana’s RV Doppler Observatory",
      "version": "v4.1.0",
      "source_ref": "4c1ad4d",
      "research_question": "Are the 250 committed RV target files inference-ready under declared numerical, duplication, provenance, offset-separability, and outlier contracts, and can the browser analysis avoid instrument-zero-point confounding?",
      "principal_result": "Only 39 of 250 files pass all six inference-readiness gates. The audit finds 34,153 rows in repeated-epoch groups, 181 files with reference/offset confounding, and 44 files with extreme full-to-robust RV-span ratios; non-ready bundled files are now blocked from automatic scanning and fitting.",
      "evidence": ["154,150 committed rows and 250 canonical SHA-256 file receipts", "Group-centered weighted candidate-period scan with no false-alarm claim", "Analytic amplitude and per-instrument systemic-offset solution in a bounded fixed-period grid", "11 JavaScript tests, 8 Python tests, 18 structural integrity checks, and 11 interface contracts", "Dark/light WCAG-AA token audit, reduced-motion controls, semantic navigation, and 390 px overflow verification", "Four v4.1 interface-evidence assets with GitHub-verified SHA-256 digests"],
      "before_score": 32,
      "after_score": 96,
      "claim_boundary": "A bundle-quality and first-pass diagnostic study. Passing the gates does not validate source-publication units or identities, and the descriptive scan and bounded fit do not establish a false-alarm probability, planet detection, posterior, or publication-grade orbit.",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/Jana-s-RV-Doppler-Observatory",
      "release_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/Jana-s-RV-Doppler-Observatory/releases/tag/v4.1.0",
      "live_url": "https://biswajit1999.github.io/Jana-s-RV-Doppler-Observatory/"
    },
    {
      "rank": 13,
      "slug": "Adaptive_Optics_Wavefront_Lab",
      "title": "Adaptive Optics Wavefront Lab",
      "version": "v3.0.0",
      "source_ref": "9547584",
      "research_question": "Does the 300-frame browser reduction preserve the values, distributions, and temporal content of all 15,000 released CIAO adaptive-optics telemetry frames?",
      "principal_result": "Every retained sample matches the released FITS source within the declared six-decimal rounding, and all three distribution gates pass. The temporal-fidelity null is rejected: 20.89%, 9.19%, and 64.46% of full-rate gradient-RMS, command-RMS, and mean-flux power lies above the reduced product's 5 Hz Nyquist frequency.",
      "evidence": ["15,000 released CIAO1 frames audited against 300 browser samples", "Exact retained-point parity within six-decimal rounding", "Three distribution gates pass and the predeclared temporal-fidelity gate fails", "Released FITS source DOI, programme metadata, and MD5 receipt", "Node 24 and Python 3.12 research verification plus Pages deployment", "Six release assets with GitHub-verified SHA-256 digests"],
      "before_score": 51,
      "after_score": 95,
      "claim_boundary": "The browser asset is a sparse visual and distributional overview. It does not preserve full-rate temporal spectra and cannot support loop-bandwidth, transfer-function, controller-reconstruction, wavefront-phase, or PSF claims.",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/Adaptive_Optics_Wavefront_Lab",
      "release_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/Adaptive_Optics_Wavefront_Lab/releases/tag/v3.0.0",
      "live_url": "https://biswajit1999.github.io/Adaptive_Optics_Wavefront_Lab/"
    },
    {
      "rank": 14,
      "slug": "roman-microlensing-readiness",
      "title": "Synthetic Point-Lens Microlensing Recovery Study",
      "version": "v0.5.1",
      "source_ref": "93aa9fa",
      "research_question": "Under a declared Roman-motivated cadence and white-noise proxy, does crossing a blind event-detection threshold imply that the injected t0, u0, and tE are identifiable?",
      "principal_result": "The blind search detects 864 of 900 balanced synthetic injections (96.0%, Wilson 95% CI 94.5–97.1%) but recovers the predeclared parameters in 710 (78.9%, 76.1–81.4%). At F146=24 and tE=0.02 d, detection is 41/75 while parameter recovery is 22/75; 0/1,000 simple constant-flux nulls trigger, constraining that scoped null rate below 0.383% at 95% confidence.",
      "evidence": ["900 injections with unique parameter-aware master, cadence, epoch, and noise seeds", "1,000 identically searched null realizations with raw rows and Wilson intervals", "Truth-blind matched-filter proposal followed by bounded fitting and full-epoch chi-square evaluation", "39 tests, Ruff validation, and Python 3.10/3.12 CI", "Clean-commit manifests, canonical cross-platform evidence hashes, generated CSV/JSON/SVG artifacts, and release-asset verification", "Failed custom binary-lens validation preserved as a negative result and runtime-disabled"],
      "before_score": 39,
      "after_score": 95,
      "claim_boundary": "A balanced conditional software-selection experiment for isolated synthetic point lenses. It is not Roman mission completeness, yield, readiness, a survey false-positive rate, a population forecast, or validated bound-planet inference.",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/roman-microlensing-readiness",
      "release_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/roman-microlensing-readiness/releases/tag/v0.5.1",
      "live_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/roman-microlensing-readiness#v05-result"
    },
    {
      "rank": 15,
      "slug": "k2-18b-exoplanet-report",
      "title": "K2-18 b Spectral Robustness Audit",
      "version": "v1.0.0",
      "source_ref": "652ad23",
      "research_question": "Do the repository's descriptive 4.3 micrometre contrast and a diagonal-error MIRI flat-spectrum test remain significant under predeclared window and leave-one-bin-out perturbations?",
      "principal_result": "The historical window reproduces at 4.07 ± 23.16 ppm (0.176 sigma), while 30 predeclared window choices span -0.861 to +2.258 sigma and none reaches |3 sigma|. The 27-bin MIRI flat fit gives p = 0.000968, but deleting the 5.375 micrometre bin raises p to 0.07832, so the result fails the declared every-one-bin-deletion robustness rule.",
      "evidence": ["4,411-point NIRISS+NIRSpec spectrum and separate 28-bin MIRI source product with canonical SHA-256 receipts", "30 fully reported band/continuum definitions", "27 leave-one-bin-out MIRI refits", "NASA Exoplanet Archive parameter snapshot with exact TAP query", "17 tests, Ruff validation, and Python 3.10/3.12/3.13 CI", "Deterministic numerical JSON/CSV evidence and semantically validated SVG figures"],
      "before_score": 45,
      "after_score": 96,
      "claim_boundary": "A sensitivity audit of two simple descriptive statistics under diagonal uncertainties. It is not an atmospheric retrieval, molecular detection or exclusion, covariance-aware re-reduction, habitability assessment, or biosignature claim.",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/k2-18b-exoplanet-report",
      "release_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/k2-18b-exoplanet-report/releases/tag/v1.0.0",
      "live_url": "https://biswajit1999.github.io/k2-18b-exoplanet-report/"
    },
    {
      "rank": 16,
      "slug": "wasp-80b-exoplanet-report",
      "title": "WASP-80 b Native-Channel Morphology Audit",
      "version": "v1.0.0",
      "source_ref": "af0a8f0",
      "research_question": "Does the descriptive residual contrast between the published full and component-removed CH4 curves keep the same sign across declared adjacent-channel bin widths and origins in both transmission and emission?",
      "principal_result": "All 113 native source-data channels were reconstructed. The component-removal residual contrast remains positive across all 30 declared designs per geometry: 63.17 to 85.74 in transmission and 217.65 to 245.99 in emission. The result is posterior morphology sensitivity, not an independent methane detection test.",
      "evidence": ["113 native JWST/NIRCam source-data channels with source and derivative SHA-256 receipts", "30 declared bin-width/origin designs per geometry and 60 fully reported rows", "Complete leave-one-bin-out diagnostics", "One-sector TESS acquisition boundary stated explicitly", "15 tests and Python 3.10/3.12/3.13 CI", "Portable spectral evidence gates and tolerance-based nonlinear optimizer regression"],
      "before_score": 50,
      "after_score": 94,
      "claim_boundary": "The component-removed curves are posterior spectral post-processing from a retrieval fitted to the same observations, not independently refitted nested null models. The contrast is not a detection significance, abundance retrieval, validation set, or reproduction of the published atmospheric retrieval.",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/wasp-80b-exoplanet-report",
      "release_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/wasp-80b-exoplanet-report/releases/tag/v1.0.0",
      "live_url": "https://biswajit1999.github.io/wasp-80b-exoplanet-report/"
    },
    {
      "rank": 17,
      "slug": "spectrograph-rv-precision-lab",
      "title": "Spectrograph RV Proxy Generalization Audit",
      "version": "v2.0.0",
      "source_ref": "dd1c3b4",
      "research_question": "After calibration at one fiducial spectrum, does a linear resolving-power proxy preserve the discrete photon-information bound across stellar line-width, depth, and line-count regimes?",
      "principal_result": "Across 288 predeclared synthetic spectra, the calibrated legacy proxy is at least twofold too optimistic in 39 scenarios and reaches a maximum exact-to-proxy uncertainty ratio of 2.924. From R=100,000 to 250,000 it claims a 60% gain for every line width, while the exact median gain falls to 5.86% for 10 km/s intrinsic lines and rises to 66.89% for 1 km/s lines.",
      "evidence": ["288 fully reported scenarios across resolving power, intrinsic width, depth, and line count", "Discrete Bouchy-style Poisson Fisher bound with fixed coverage and continuum-electron budget", "Four-versus-eight-pixel convergence with maximum relative difference 1.162e-6 and zero primary-classification changes", "Nine numerical tests and Node 20/22/24 CI", "Protocol and scientific-model SHA-256 bindings plus byte-stable generated evidence", "Seven release assets with GitHub-verified SHA-256 digests"],
      "before_score": 41,
      "after_score": 95,
      "claim_boundary": "A controlled synthetic photon-information experiment, not an end-to-end spectrograph forecast, exposure-time calculator, stellar-template analysis, calibration model, achieved precision, or planet-detection completeness study.",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/spectrograph-rv-precision-lab",
      "release_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/spectrograph-rv-precision-lab/releases/tag/v2.0.0",
      "live_url": "https://biswajit1999.github.io/spectrograph-rv-precision-lab/"
    },
    {
      "rank": 18,
      "slug": "wasp-39b-exoplanet-report",
      "title": "WASP-39 b Supplied-Model Sensitivity Audit",
      "version": "v2.0.0",
      "source_ref": "e25b5c5",
      "research_question": "Does the descriptive preference for the archived full ScCHIMERA curve over its remove-CO2 curve retain its sign under strict common support, model integration, asymmetric-error rules, every rebin origin, covariance stress tests, and contiguous wavelength-block deletion?",
      "principal_result": "All 60 declared preprocessing designs retain a positive supplied-model contrast, spanning delta chi-square 559.6 to 780.4, and every single-bin deletion remains above 684.8. Yet deleting a 0.5-micrometre block around the 4.3-micrometre feature reduces the contrast to 3.19 and the outside-4.1-to-4.6-micrometre refit gives 6.04, demonstrating preprocessing stability but strong spectral localization.",
      "evidence": ["93 strict common-support bins from the 94-bin Eureka PRISM spectrum", "60 fully reported sampling/error/bin-factor/origin designs", "20-cell illustrative covariance grid with eigenvalue and condition-number diagnostics", "All declared single-bin and 0.10/0.25/0.50-micrometre contiguous-block deletions", "Cross-platform offline SHA-256 verification against exact Zenodo ZIP entries", "14 tests and Python 3.11/3.12 CI with SHA-pinned Node 24 actions", "Seven release assets with GitHub-verified SHA-256 digests"],
      "before_score": 55,
      "after_score": 95,
      "claim_boundary": "A descriptive sensitivity audit of two fixed archive curves after one fitted offset each. It is not an atmospheric retrieval, nested hypothesis test, molecular detection significance, abundance constraint, detector-level covariance inference, or reproduction of the literature G395H retrieval.",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/wasp-39b-exoplanet-report",
      "release_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/wasp-39b-exoplanet-report/releases/tag/v2.0.0",
      "live_url": "https://biswajit1999.github.io/wasp-39b-exoplanet-report/"
    },
    {
      "rank": 19,
      "slug": "wasp-43b-exoplanet-report",
      "title": "WASP-43 b Phase-Curve Identifiability Audit",
      "version": "v2.0.0",
      "source_ref": "1844be3",
      "research_question": "Does a pre-eclipse first-harmonic maximum remain directionally stable across reductions, wavelength windows, aggregation rules, uncertainty conventions, and wavelength deletion, and can four archived phase spectra identify the source paper's two-harmonic model?",
      "principal_result": "All 180 predeclared first-harmonic designs place the maximum before eclipse, spanning -9.71 to -7.66 degrees with a median of -8.82 degrees; leave-one-trusted-wavelength results span -9.72 to -8.95 degrees. Four phase observations identify the three-parameter first harmonic with one residual degree of freedom, while the five-parameter two-harmonic design has rank four and is underidentified.",
      "evidence": ["Two HDF5 spectra verified byte-for-byte against exact Zenodo archive members", "11 trusted 5.25-10.25 micrometre bins used for inference and three shadowed-region bins retained only for provenance/display", "180 fully reported reduction/window/aggregation/error-rule designs", "22 leave-one-wavelength-out refits across both reductions", "Explicit one- versus two-harmonic design-matrix rank audit", "13 tests and Python 3.11/3.12 CI with SHA-pinned Node 24 actions", "Seven v2.0.0 release assets with GitHub-verified digests"],
      "before_score": 48,
      "after_score": 94,
      "claim_boundary": "A sensitivity and identifiability audit of four archived phase-binned spectra. It supports a pre-eclipse maximum only under a first-harmonic summary; it does not reproduce the full time-series two-harmonic inference, shared covariance, a hotspot posterior, bolometric energy budget, Bond albedo, heat redistribution, or atmospheric retrieval.",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/wasp-43b-exoplanet-report",
      "release_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/wasp-43b-exoplanet-report/releases/tag/v2.0.0",
      "live_url": "https://biswajit1999.github.io/wasp-43b-exoplanet-report/"
    },
    {
      "rank": 20,
      "slug": "hat-p-11b-exoplanet-report",
      "title": "HAT-P-11 b Helium Estimator Sensitivity Audit",
      "version": "v2.0.0",
      "source_ref": "b9967f3",
      "research_question": "Does the transit-centred helium dip remain positive across declared phase windows, baseline exclusions, baseline sides, weighting rules, and point deletion while preserving exact archive provenance?",
      "principal_result": "All 74 valid predeclared estimator designs retain a positive helium dip, spanning 0.511% to 1.160% with a median of 0.841%. The 16 default-design leave-one-point-out estimates span 0.747% to 1.003%; formal signal-to-noise values of 3.64 to 14.06 are conditional on independent reported errors and are not an independent detection significance.",
      "evidence": ["Two renamed inputs matched to exact Zenodo ZIP members by canonical-LF SHA-256", "74 fully reported phase-window, exclusion, weighting, and baseline-side designs", "16 leave-one-point-out estimates for the default in- and out-of-transit samples", "Published 1.08 +/- 0.05% result kept separate from the repository estimator", "Four tests and Python 3.11 CI with SHA-pinned Node 24 actions", "Six v2.0.0 release assets with GitHub-verified SHA-256 digests"],
      "before_score": 44,
      "after_score": 94,
      "claim_boundary": "A descriptive sensitivity audit of a phase-folded literature product. It is not a raw-exposure re-reduction, covariance-aware transit-model reproduction, independent helium detection significance, mass-loss rate, or atmospheric-escape-rate inference.",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/hat-p-11b-exoplanet-report",
      "release_url": "https://github.com/Biswajit1999/hat-p-11b-exoplanet-report/releases/tag/v2.0.0",
      "live_url": "https://biswajit1999.github.io/hat-p-11b-exoplanet-report/"
    }
  ]
}